Fedlife Assurance V Wolfaardt

And Others 2007 5 SA 1 SCA Boost Sports Africa Pty Ltd v South African Breweries Ltd 2014 4 343 GP. FEDLIFE ASSURANCE LIMITED v HENDRIK JOHANNES WOLFAARDT Case Number.

Ccmail March 2004

Wolfaardt v Fedlife Assurance Ltd is an important precedent-setting case in South African labour law decided by Odendaal AJ on August 31 1999.

Fedlife assurance v wolfaardt. FEDLIFE ASSURANCE LIMITED Appellant. However there can be no suggestion that the constitutional dispensation deprived employees of the common law right to enforce the terms of the fixed term contract of employment. 2002 5 SA 73 W Campbell and Another v Kwapa and Another 2002 6 SA 739 W Registrar of Pension Funds and Others v Angus NO.

In that matter the court said the following. 25 2005 4 BLLR 313. Fedlife Assurance Ltd v Wolfaardt 2002 1 SA 49 SCA Tolstrup NO.

Important precedent-setting case in South African labour law decided by Odendaal AJ on August 31 1999. Accordingly it is not a defence to an unfair dismissal claim that the employees dismissal was lawful see NUMSA v Vetsak Co-operative Ltd. SA South African Law Reports.

450-1999 SCA Date of Award. Some acronyms of Law Reports are as follows. Section 157 does not purport to confer exclusive jurisdiction on the Labour Court generally in relation to employment matters and accordingly the jurisdiction of the High Court is not ousted by s1571 simply because the dispute falls within the sphere of employment relations see Fedlife Assurance Ltd v Wolfaardt 2002 1 49 693 and Fredricks v MEC for Education 2002 2 SA 693.

Wolfaardt v Fedlife Assurance Ltd is an important precedent-setting case in South African labour law decided by Odendaal AJ on August 31 1999. 24 Fedlife Assurance Ltd v Wolfaardt supra 1313 par 42-44. 18 September 2001 Damages for repudiation of fixed-term employment contract if not whether such claim.

Selected CCMA Cases. Examples of overlapping jurisdiction in the employment sphere3 In Fedlife Assurance Ltd v Wolfaardt an employee dismissed prior to expiration of a fixed-term contract. Decided - apparently in order to escape the limi tations on compensation for unfair dismissal contained in the LRA - to.

It was heard in the Witwatersrand Local Division. Written by Gary Watkins. Follows by the majority of the Supreme Court of Appeal SCA in Fedlife Assurance Ltd v Wolfaardt.

The Supreme Court of Appeal was asked to decide whether the enactment of the Labour Relations Act and in particular the pr. Mr Watt-Pringle SC who appeared for the applicant relied on Fedlife Assurance Ltd v Wolfaardt 2002 1 SA 49 SCA. Written by Gary Watkins.

FEDLIFE ASSURANCE LIMITED v HENDRIK JOHANNES WOLFAARDT. Topics similar to or like Wolfaardt v Fedlife Assurance. View Fedlife Assurance v Wolfaardt 2002 2 All SA 295 SCApdf from SA 295 at University of South Africa.

In Fedlife Assurance Ltd supra the cause of action was based on a breach of contract of fixed term. Thus Mampeule like any. FEDLIFE ASSURANCE LIMITED Appellant and HENDRIK JOHANNES WOLFAARDT Respondent Coram.

Wolfaardt v Fedlife Assurance. Assurance Ltd v Wolfaardt 2002 1 SA 49 SCA and that the decision was confirmed by the SCA on Gcaba supra. 18 September 2001 CAN A FIXED TERM EMPLOYEE BE UNFAIRLY DISMISSED.

Name of Applicant v Name of Respondent Year Volume Law Report Starting page number Division of Court. In the matter between. Fedlife Assurance Ltd v Wolfaardt 2001 12 BLLR 1301 SCA.

2007 Fedlife Assurance v Wolfaardt 2001 22 ILJ 2407 SCA Food Nutritional Products Pty Ltd v Neumann 1986 3 SA 464 W Fry s Metal v NUMSA. It was heard in the Witwatersrand Local Division. FEDLIFE ASSURANCE LIMITED v HENDRIK JOHANNES WOLFAARDT.

This is because the CC decision in Fredericks and Others v MEC for Education and Training Eastern Cape and Others 2002 2 SA 693 CC clarified the issue. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH. SA South African Law Reports.

20 Reliance on Fedlife Assurance Ltd and Gcaba decisions is misplaced. In a matter involving the right to claim damages for repudiation of fixed-term employment contract. 16 S 1881ab s 192 and Schedule 8 of the LRA the Code of Good Practice.

6 addressed this by reiterating in the light of authorities such as Fedlife Assurance v Wolfaardt 2001 22 ILJ 2407 SCA Denel v Vorster 2004 4 SA 481 SCA and Fredericks and others v MEC for Education and Training Eastern Cape and others 2002 2 SA 693 CC that employment related actions give rise to more than one cause of. 450-1999 SCA Date of Award. See Fedlife Assurance v Wolfaardt 2001 22 ILJ 2407 SCA.

Knowing which Law Report it is in is especially important - it can save you looking in the wrong place. Fedlife Assurance Ltd. 23 Fedlife Assurance Ltd v Wolfaardt supra 1305 par 14.

See also Key Delta v Marriner 1998 6 BLLR 647 E where the High Court suggested that the law might have developed to the point where a pre-dismissal hearing could be implied into a contract of employment. The fine principle in the Fredericks case which is underpinned by a lucid analysis of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 the LRA was understandably confirmed by the Supreme Court of Appeal SCA in Fedlife Assurance Ltd v Wolfaardt. SCA Supreme Court of Appeal.

16 August 2001 Delivered. Taking the example of Fedlife Assurance Ltd v Wolfaardt 2002 1 SA 49 SCA. 6 than one million cases were referred to the CCMA of which 80 per cent related.

Howie Marais Mpati JJA Nugent and Froneman AJJA Heard. Denel Pty Ltd v Vorster 2005 4 BLLR 313 SCA. Labour Law Lab321 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL.

Some eight years ago it was argued before this court in Fedlife Assurance Ltd v Wolfaardt 1 that claims for the enforcement of contracts of employment had been excluded from the jurisdiction of. Fedlife Assurance v Wolfaardt 2002 2 All SA 295 SCA Course. CAN A FIXED TERM EMPLOYEE BE UNFAIRLY DISMISSED.

The plaintiff sued the defendant for damages arising from an alleged repudiation of the plaintiffs contract of employment by the defendant. FEDLIFE ASSURANCE LIMITED v HENDRIK JOHANNES WOLFAARDT. 4 There can be no suggestion that the constitutional dispensation deprived employees of the common-law right to enforce the terms of a fixed-term contract of employment.